TREENG
The platform — now live

Treeng.
The discipline, productised.

Judgment-Centered Leadership Design has always been a method: diagnose before you prescribe, grade the evidence before you act, and never present a number you cannot walk someone through line by line.

Treeng is that method built into software. Sixteen diagnostic engines that take your data, run a named methodology against it, grade the strength of every finding, and hand back an Excel workbook with live formulas and a deck you own outright.

Run a free diagnostic → See a sample report

No credit card · First diagnostic free · Every finding evidence-graded

treeng — diagnostic Complete
Module · L&D ROI Engine
Every finding carries its own confidence grade.
Programme cost-to-outcome linkageFull population · clean inputs
A
Manager capability as a driverDirection reliable · wider band
B
Onboarding as an ROI dragNeeds 2 more quarters of data
C
PDF · Excel · PPTX — every formula traceable

Illustrative. Your analysis runs on your own data.

16
Diagnostic engines
One workspace
<5 min
To a defensible
report, most modules
100%
Of findings carry
an evidence grade
Free
To start
No card required
WHY
01 — Why it exists

The analysis was never the hard part. The defensibility was.

Every capability leader I have worked with can describe their problem. What they cannot do, on the timeline the business actually runs on, is produce the artefact that makes the problem actionable at board level — the one where the methodology is named, the sample size is stated, and the confidence in each finding is explicit.

So the work goes outside. Six to twelve weeks later a PDF arrives. The numbers cannot be edited, the method is proprietary, and every follow-up question restarts the meter.

The dependency is the product.

Treeng inverts that. You keep the workbook. You keep the formulas. You can interrogate any number in it, change an assumption, and watch the conclusion move. That is not a convenience feature — it is the difference between a report you present and a report you can defend.

02 — The part nobody else does

Every finding tells you how much to trust it.

A consultant will not tell you which of their conclusions is thin. The engagement is priced on confidence. A system has no such incentive.

A

Solid. Sufficient sample, clean inputs, statistically meaningful. Act on it.

B

Indicative. The direction is reliable; the magnitude carries a wider band. Treat as a strong signal, not a settled figure.

C

Needs more data. The engine tells you exactly which data would move it up a grade.

This is the same standard I hold my own consulting work to, and the reason the evidence page on this site carries sector-only cases with sourced figures rather than a wall of logos. If a number cannot be walked through, it does not get presented.

ENGINES
03 — Sixteen engines

Each one does what a consulting team takes six weeks to produce.

Strategy · Free
AI Readiness & Workforce Transformation

AI exposure scored by role. The reskilling roadmap that follows from it.

L&D · Free
L&D ROI Engine

Kirkpatrick-Phillips applied end to end. Every dollar traced to an outcome.

Operations · Free
Root Cause Analysis

Ishikawa, 5-Why and Pareto run against your own data, not a workshop whiteboard.

L&D · Free
Training Needs Analysis

Gap to curriculum, with the curriculum actually specified.

Analytics · Free
Industry Data Analysis

Upload, analyse, decide. Sector benchmarks built in.

HR · Starter
Skills Gap Mapper

Current against required, sequenced into a prioritised development path.

Strategy · Starter
Org Health Diagnostic

Multi-dimensional scoring that names what is broken and where to start.

Operations · Starter
Process Efficiency Auditor

Lean analysis, waste identification, automation candidates ranked.

HR · Pro
Survey Intelligence

Responses turned into predictions. Who is at risk, and what is actually driving it.

Procurement · Pro
Vendor Intelligence

Competing bids scored on equal terms, with the fine print surfaced.

Compliance · Pro
Compliance Scanner

ISO, labour law and industry frameworks resolved into a gap matrix.

Strategy · Pro
Decision Intelligence

Meeting quality scored, decision rights mapped, actions tracked to closure.

Operations · Pro
IdeaMap

Design thinking, causal loops and affinity mapping built around your actual challenge.

L&D · Enterprise
ID Studio

ADDIE or SAM, your rules. Full eLearning and facilitated decks built to your curriculum.

Strategy · Enterprise
Research Pro

Live-cited synthesis. Named studies, source-indexed — evidence, not internal opinion.

HR · Enterprise
Capability Scanner

Org-wide competency gaps against benchmarks, with the path to green per role.

Five engines are free to run. Pricing starts at $9 per analysis, or $49 a month with no auto-renewal. Full module list, sample outputs and pricing at treeng.ai.

04 — What changes

Same rigour. Different economics.

 
Commissioned engagement
Treeng
Time to output
Six to twelve weeks
Under five minutes, most modules
Methodology
Proprietary, undisclosed
Named and printed — Kirkpatrick-Phillips, ADDIE, Lean, Ishikawa
Confidence
Implied by the seniority of the presenter
Graded A, B or C on every single finding
Output
Locked PDF you cannot edit
Excel with live formulas, PowerPoint you own
Re-running it
A new brief, a new fee
One click, same rigour
Dependency
Every follow-up question costs more
None. Pay once, no auto-renewal

Comparable external engagements in this category are commonly quoted in the $50,000 to $200,000 range. That is a market observation about typical consulting scope, not a figure from any SSUNDAR engagement, and your own alternatives will vary.

05 — Who it is for

Leaders who answer to a CFO without an analyst on speed dial.

L&D, HR, operations and strategy leads who are asked to justify a budget, size a gap or explain a number on a timeline that does not accommodate a procurement cycle. If you have the data and need the artefact, this is the shortest defensible path to it.

It does not replace the consulting work on this site. A diagnostic tells you what is broken; it does not rebuild the architecture underneath it. Where the finding is structural — where judgment itself is the constraint rather than the measurement of it — that is still an engagement, not a report.

Most people should start with the free diagnostic and see what the evidence grade says before deciding which of the two they need.

Run one.

The first diagnostic is free and takes minutes. You will see the full output on screen before you pay anything — including the evidence grade on every finding, which is the only part that actually matters.

Open Treeng →

treeng.ai · Treeng by SSUNDAR.